Queer Watch

Ask/Suggest   Submit   Recommendation Guidelines   

Following LGBT, queer, gender & sexuality related blogs.

Suggestions go here. [Guidelines]

What kind of LGBTQ tumblrs are you looking for?

Audience: {Homosexual} {Lesbian} {Bisexual} {Pansexual/Multi*sexual} {Asexual} {Trans*/I & Genderqueer} {General Queer}

Theme: {Art & Photography} {Humor} {Help & Advice} {Projects, Writing & Music} {Personal} {Film, TV & Celebrity} {18+} {Feminism} {Queer Inclusive}

eddyizm:

Ohio Republicans ‘balance budget’ by banning legal protections for gay couples
With the passage of S.B. 5 by Senate Republicans in Ohio today, Republicans proclaimed:
“This is the first big step in restoring fiscal responsibility in Ohio.”
Uh huh. Tucked in the bill is this little nugget:
Sec. 3101.01 of S.B. 5: … A marriage may only be entered  into by one man and one woman. Any marriage between persons of the same  sex is against the strong public policy of this state. Any marriage  between persons of the same sex shall have no legal force or effect in  this state and, if attempted to be entered into in this state, is void  ab initio and shall not be recognized by this state. The recognition or  extension by the state of the specific statutory benefits of a legal  marriage to non-marital relationships between persons of the same sex or  different sexes is against the strong public policy of this state. Any  public act, record or judicial proceeding of this state, as defined in  section 9.82 of the Revised Code, that extends the specific statutory  benefits of legal marriage to non-marital relationships between persons  of the same sex or different sexes is void.
So along with union-busting, Ohio Republicans are saving money (and  no doubt creating jobs) by stripping any kind of legal protections for  gay couples. Fiscal responsibility, Republican-style. Otherwise known as  bigotry.

eddyizm:

Ohio Republicans ‘balance budget’ by banning legal protections for gay couples

With the passage of S.B. 5 by Senate Republicans in Ohio today, Republicans proclaimed:

“This is the first big step in restoring fiscal responsibility in Ohio.”

Uh huh. Tucked in the bill is this little nugget:

Sec. 3101.01 of S.B. 5: … A marriage may only be entered into by one man and one woman. Any marriage between persons of the same sex is against the strong public policy of this state. Any marriage between persons of the same sex shall have no legal force or effect in this state and, if attempted to be entered into in this state, is void ab initio and shall not be recognized by this state. The recognition or extension by the state of the specific statutory benefits of a legal marriage to non-marital relationships between persons of the same sex or different sexes is against the strong public policy of this state. Any public act, record or judicial proceeding of this state, as defined in section 9.82 of the Revised Code, that extends the specific statutory benefits of legal marriage to non-marital relationships between persons of the same sex or different sexes is void.

So along with union-busting, Ohio Republicans are saving money (and no doubt creating jobs) by stripping any kind of legal protections for gay couples. Fiscal responsibility, Republican-style. Otherwise known as bigotry.

(via stfuconservatives)

— 11 months ago with 216 notes
  1. marshdavegan reblogged this from blossomswillsproutfromthecarcass and added:
    fucking Mormons in Ohio, ILL KILL YOU ALL
  2. jennderqueer reblogged this from eddyizm
  3. blossomswillsproutfromthecarcass reblogged this from porcinestresssyndrome
  4. floorclaudiuscaroline reblogged this from reinventionoftheprintingpress
  5. sheepshrooms reblogged this from allthebees
  6. agingbuffoon reblogged this from allthebees and added:
    Oh I am going to protest the shit out of this. Who’s with me?
  7. porcinestresssyndrome reblogged this from allthebees
  8. allthebees reblogged this from reinventionoftheprintingpress and added:
    Ohio balances budgets funnily. (Rally in Marietta at 4:30 on Monday at Muskingum Park if any of my MC/MOV followers are...
  9. reinventionoftheprintingpress reblogged this from 77825225672443
  10. 77825225672443 reblogged this from stfuconservatives
  11. smdy reblogged this from stfuconservatives
  12. anindiscriminatecollection reblogged this from hairtrending
  13. eeesobel reblogged this from stfuconservatives
  14. luxliquidus reblogged this from chaplinnn and added:
    This is pathetic.
  15. -rainbowkid reblogged this from dietonightliveforever-
  16. missmokushiroku reblogged this from stfuconservatives and added:
    I don’t even know what to say.
  17. sammywhatammy reblogged this from stfuconservatives
  18. nomylastnameisnotcastro reblogged this from subject-to-change
  19. spiralingsidewayz reblogged this from goestoeleven and added:
    Yeah, because it’s all those pesky gays and their quest for equal rights that is sending Ohio into the shitter. Man, I...
  20. tuwmnsngndrstudies reblogged this from queerwatch and added:
    Republicans are disgusting.
  21. goestoeleven reblogged this from insooutso and added:
    Unreal. For all the hysteria and vitriol spewed by conservatives about “pork barrel” spending and the practice of...
  22. wespecializeinhomosexualhairdos reblogged this from nohetero and added:
    Anti-woman? Anti-gay? Right wing bigots go away!
  23. vehementdesire reblogged this from insooutso
  24. insooutso reblogged this from chaplinnn and added:
    The Dems played nice for far too long. We should have flipped the dinner table on it’s side when we got into office.
  25. disordered-introvert reblogged this from dietonightliveforever-
  26. dietonightliveforever- reblogged this from thirteenspines
  27. thirteenspines reblogged this from stfuconservatives
  28. kivitasku reblogged this from queerwatch and added:
    They sure are determined and sneaky. More weddings would boost economy, so they just hid anti-gay marriage legislation...
  29. movingwikiwiki reblogged this from stfuconservatives